Analysis Of A Healthcare Lawsuit Case

Issues and Holdings

The patient, Mary Schlodendorff then sued the charity hospital because; she held the hospitals’ management responsible for the actions of the nurses and doctors who are employed in it. This is the legal doctrine of respondeat superior. She did not make any claim against any singular nurse or doctor. According to Mary, she did not consent to undergoing through the tumor removal operation and had expressly informed the doctor not to operate on her body.Analysis Of A Healthcare Lawsuit Case

Legality of the Case

Mary has legal law in this case because the hospital was responsible for treading on the rights of adult individuals as well as the amputation of her fingers that was done because of the gangrene and infection which were caused as a side-effect of the tumor removal operation. In this case she had a ground to sue to the hospital. According to the Tort Law, any situation in which the behavior of the person is harmed another individual or has caused him grief or loss, in an unfair manner. The ‘tort’ does not have to be illegal act, however it does cause harm to another individual. Going along this law, any person who is harmed according to the mentioned circumstance, are legally allowed to recover or ask compensation of their loss.

Defense presented by the Hospital

There are a few principles of law that govern the duties and rights of the health care institutions when they are working as charitable institutions.Analysis Of A Healthcare Lawsuit Case