The Nursing Workplace Practice Changes Essay

Secondary outcomes in clinical studies require re-evidence to advance change in clinical practice. As evidence-based practice is central to clinical practice, the nature of evidence determines the validity and practicability of decisions aimed at evolving change in the workplace. Costantino, Montano, and Casazza (2015) advise healthcare providers to differentiate between primary and secondary outcomes of clinical studies before considering their applications in the improvement of clinical practice. Primary results offer ‘hard’ findings that directly relate to patients, whereas secondary outcomes provide ‘soft’ findings that indirectly relate to patients.The Nursing Workplace Practice Changes Essay

Usually, a clinical study has a primary outcome, which is the center of the study, and several secondary outcomes, which are auxiliary and dependent on the primary outcome. Despite the significance of secondary outcomes, they are not valid and reliable in advancing change because the design of the research does not focus on their production. Costantino et al. (2015) consider secondary outcomes as not clinically meaningful but explorative findings that await further studies to confirm their validity and reliability in clinical practice. In this view, re-evidence is necessary to adjust the research design and focus on secondary outcomes with the objective of confirming the validity of findings.

Application of Emphatic Approach in Nursing Care

The emphatic approach to care applies to the practice of nursing for it provides a way of translating phenomenological knowledge as evidence-based findings for nursing care. The embodied relational understanding, the aesthetic phenomenology, and the translational process are the three consecutive steps that nurses have to follow in applying the approach of emphatic knowledge in nursing care (Galvin & Todres, 2011).The Nursing Workplace Practice Changes Essay