Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

APA 7 format needed. Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the \”Research Critique Guidelines – Part II\” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses. Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment. In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Background

Two journal articles, Dias et al. (2015) and Al-Omari et al. (2019) discuss the outcomes from two different quantitative studies that focused on the value of RRTs (RRTs) in inpatient care environments. Al-Omari et al. (2019) state the research outcomes to discover the results of implementing an RRT. Background knowledge of significant mortalities and morbidities caused by cardiopulmonary arrests in health centers influenced the researchers to conduct this study. Therefore, researchers suggested that implementing an RRT can help solve the occurrences of cardiopulmonary arrests because the teams have been able to prevent health deteriorations in other patients with related conditions. The outcome of this research stipulates that the response teams managed to reduce the death rates from 0.78% to 0.28%, which approximately 0.5% reduction. Besides, the researchers observed critical reductions in the quality of occupancy and admissions. In association with the outcomes, researchers support the adoption of RRTs as a measure of reducing cardiopulmonary arrests and improving the quality of services. Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

On the other hand, Dias et al. (2015) cover the outcomes of a research that explores nurses’ opinions concerning the quality of services that the RRT can provide within the health care setting or environment and the number of lives they can save from cardiopulmonary arrests. This study illustrates that; however, the response teams have made much effort as described through epidemiological data, there is no need to have such units in the healthcare setting. The study further explains that such units are not required in the healthcare setting because nurses are trained to provide the same services; therefore, nurses are just enough, and no more quick response teams are needed. The researchers collected primary research data from 22 nurses and compared them to RRTs. This data showed that, though the RRTs have improved outcomes and care delivery in the healthcare settings, they are still far from reaching their full potential concerning the outcome, process, and structure. However, the researchers discovered that the response teams could produce better results by leveraging enough team positions and interpersonal relationships. In summary, the researchers stated that implementers can boost team performance by providing the response teams with better and more advanced materials, the statistical data on the area they work, and technical support. Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

How the Two Articles Support the Nurse Practice

Nurse practice and quick response teams are two related aspects of nursing. The two articles cover the roles of RRTs and their advantages over nurses. On the other hand, the report covers the disadvantages of both over each other. Nurse practice’s primary concern is whether to allow RRTs to handle or offer inpatient care services to patients at risk of sudden death, like cardiopulmonary arrests. The most concerning question is how the quick response team compares to not having any healthcare setting units affect the hospitals’ rate of deaths. The main expectation of this here is that the RRTs will significantly reduce hospitals’ death rates during the study time. Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

Al-Omari et al. (2019) support the employment of RRTs by depending and trusting on epidemiological data, which clearly shows that the response teams significantly reduce mortality and occupancy rates, and the number of ICU admissions. This research’s data should be a matter of concern to the nurses because their services are not provided in isolation. The other study, Dias et al. (2015), portrays the same feelings in discovering that the quick response teams are essential in boosting epidemiological performance in inpatient settings. However, the article notes that the response teams have not been well leveraged, which is disadvantageous. From the data gathered in both research articles, inpatient health care can be boosted through quick response teams’ engagement. Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

Method of Study

Both of the two research articles use quantitative tactics. Dias et al. (2015) employed a descriptive methodology to analyze the research, which used an explorative study approach to recruit 22 nurses to work in inpatient care environments. The nurses were to provide their feedback concerning the quick response team in questionnaires created by the researchers. The participants delivered their questionnaires back after noting their opinions about the response teams and improving their work. On the contrary, Al-Omari et al. (2019) applied a quasi-experimental methodology, which analyzed the performance in the healthcare settings before and after the RRT (Clifford, 2013). The research took approximately three years and was conducted across four hospitals that included 154,869 patients. This study’s outcomes were presented in percentages and counts, which compared epidemiological performance before and after the engagement of the RRT (Grove & Gray, 2019). Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay

In detail, Al-Omari et al. (2019) adopted a quasi-experimental methodology which tested the connection with the variables that are sub-optimally controllable even if the RRT is manipulated as a dependent variable. The advantage of this method is that it allows for greater generalization and transferability since one of the expectations is that the presentation of variables would give rise to similar results over the whole population. On the contrary, Dias et al. (2015) applied a descriptive methodology that illustrated that nurses’ variables with their opinions are not controlled. This method has an advantage, which is the provision of intuition into the nurses’ experience with RRTs since it relies on personal accounts. However, this method may be biased when the nurses decide to respond that the researchers are expecting rather than their honest answers.