Physical Systems Architecture For Healthcare

Recommendations for future work: Here the author explained about the architectural analysis is needed to extend the working process of medical devices for the health care. Implanted medical devices for example pacemakers and artificial pancreases and complex medical equipment such as CT scanners and surgical robotics each may require a different set of actors and interactions with a CPS. Ensuring that the architecture is able to work with a wide variety of equipment types while maintaining the security of patient information is crucial to the eventual implementation of such a system.Physical Systems Architecture For Healthcare

The key architectural requirements such as security and safety relevant for EHealth-Based CPS in this work. Furthermore, work can be done regarding to improve security of Cyber Physical System(CPS) by reducing the problems and completion delays. Weaknesses as reported by the authors: There are limit authorized knowledge sources to contributing or requesting information appropriate to their function. Data knowledge sources will exist on the unchanged segment as the blackboard manager and the blackboard database. A successful attack like DDOS type may interrupt communications for the entire CPS. Shortcomings identified by other researchers: Cited by 24 other TPs but not shortcomings are identified by any authors in those TPs. Failings that you have independently identified: This is model mainly needed to meet the security needs for medical devices in health care.Physical Systems Architecture For Healthcare