NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Nurses engaged in the policy arena often are asked to provide information on a health care topic of interest to policy makers. This is frequently accomplished through developing a policy brief. A policy brief advocates for a particular recommendation (prior to the enactment of a policy). Learning how to write a policy brief in a clear, succinct, scholarly, and professional manner is an essential skill for advanced practice nurses.

For this Assignment, you will assess one of the recommendations from the Institute of Medicine’s The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations. You will then develop a policy brief to advocate for this recommendation (the written policy brief is due in Week 7).

To prepare:

Review the Lavis et al. article on preparing and writing policy briefs provided in the Learning Resources.
Select one of the recommendations within the IOM The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations to focus on for this assignment.
Research the history of the problem behind the recommendation and what has been done to try to solve the problem.
What does the recommendation say should be done? Are there any groups, nursing and others, currently supporting work to implement the recommendation (e.g., Kaiser Family Foundation, professional organizations)? Does the recommendation suggest specific groups that should be involved in the implementation? Think critically about how the recommendation should be implemented – did the IOM get it right? What other strategies are possible to consider?
By Day 7 of Week 7

To complete:

Develop a scholarly and professionally written 2- to 3-page single-spaced policy brief on the recommendation you selected from the IOM report following the format presented in the Lavis et al. article. Include the following:
Short introduction with statement of the problem.
The selected recommendation (from the IOM Report)
Background
Current characteristics
The impact of the recommendation from the perspective of consumers, nurses, other health professionals, and additional stakeholders
Current solutions
Current status in the health policy arena
Final conclusions
Resources used to create the policy brief

Due by Day 7 of Week 7. Complete instructions for submitting your Assignment are provided in the Week 7 Assignment area.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)
NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Note: You will post a summary of your policy brief in the Week 7 Discussion.

Assignment 2: Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Program LOs: 4, 5

4: Professions/Collaborators

5: Effective Communicators

DNP Essentials: 5, 6

5: Healthcare Policy for Advocacy in Healthcare

6: Interprofessional collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes (Scroll down for table)

ASSIGNMENT PROMPT

Policy Brief Paper

Target

5 points

Acceptable

3 points

Unacceptable

1 point

Score/Level

Part 1:2- to 3-page single-spaced policy brief on the recommendation you selected from the IOM report following the format presented in the Lavis et al. article. Include the following:

Short introduction with statement of the problem.

The selected recommendation (from the IOM Report)

Background

Current characteristics

The impact of the recommendation from the perspective of consumers, nurses, other health professionals, and additional stakeholders

Current solutions

Current status in the health policy arena

Final conclusions

Resources used to create the policy brief

Program LO: 4, 5

DNP Essential: 5, 6 Exemplary quality.

Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses questions/issues discussed in the interview; Applies advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.

Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5.

Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6.Well-developed good quality work.

Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It fully meets expectations for graduate level work.

Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5.

Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6.Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.

Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Does not meet expectations for graduate level work.

Insufficient to meet expectations for graduate work for LOs 4, 5.

Insufficient Essentials 5, 6.

Part 2: References and APA requirements

Format applied as presented in the Lavis et al. article.

The majority of references are from scholarly journals, supports the topic well, and are current. Paper stays within page requirements. APA format used correctly throughout. Application of the Lavis article.

Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.

Most references are from scholarly journals and support the topic. Most references are fairly current. The paper stays within requirements. APA format used with minimal errors.

Meets expectations for graduate level work.

References are not sufficient or are mostly from the lay literature or out of date. The paper is either too long or too short. Weak writing quality and/or little evidence of correctness of APA format.