If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization?
IHP 430 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
In the final phase of this project, you will implement your performance improvement initiative. Additionally, you will discuss what success of the performance improvement plan will look like after implementation. If you chose a problem in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this final part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to formulate your paper.
V. Success of the Performance Improvement Plan
A. If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization? B. How would the existing information management systems contribute to the success of your proposal? C. What organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative, if it is successful?
D. Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative. Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Success: Financial Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers reasoning pertaining to the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful
Comprehensively describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful
Describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful, but description is cursory
Does not describe the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful
20
Success: Information Meets “Proficient” criteria and hypothesis demonstrates nuanced insight into the relationship between information management systems and performance improvement initiatives
Logically hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal
Hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal but hypothesis is illogical
Does not hypothesize how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal
20
Success: Processes Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced insight into the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative
Accurately describes the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative
Describes what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative but description is inaccurate
Does not describe what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative
20
Success: Communication
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides keen insight into interdisciplinary communication patterns typically present in a healthcare organization
Comprehensively analyzes interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative
Analyzes communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative, but patterns are not interdepartmental or analysis is cursory
Does not analyze interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative
20
Scholarly Research Meets “Proficient” criteria by including three or more scholarly research articles that give in- depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue
Includes two scholarly research articles that give in-depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue
Includes some scholarly research but does not give in-depth support to identified interdepartmental issue
Does not include scholarly research
10
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%