The implementation of “Health Insurance Exchange” in the framework of Obamacare program is likely to have a significant impact on three critical aspects: customers’ demand, pricing policy, and supply.Health Insurance Exchange: Obamacare Program Report
First, and foremost, it is necessary to focus on the changes that are likely to take place in the customers’ demand field. The implementation of the relevant law has transformed the basic principles of demand formation. Thus, people that used to choose whether to purchase a health insurance or not basing on their inner motives and estimations are now legally obliged to have an insurance coverage. Therefore, the major difference resides in the fact that the customers’ demand is now regulated by law. From the perspective of a “free market”, the relevant intervention is rather unfavorable. The artificial raising of customers’ demand minimizes the regulation power of clients in price setting due to the fact that the level of competitiveness in the insurance market will sag significantly (Glied and Ma 9). In the meantime, some specialists note, the increase in the demand is not as crucial for the market as it might seem. It is presumed that even though more people will now have a medical health insurance, the majority of them will not use the medical services more frequently than they used to do (Brezina et al. 194). In other words, people who purchase health insurance will not necessarily use them in practice. Therefore, the pressure on the supply sector might turn out to be less critical than one might expect.Health Insurance Exchange: Obamacare Program Report
The lack of balance between demand and supply is likely to have a negative impact on price setting. According to the basic principles of the law of the market, the decrease in supply leads to the inevitable cost rising. Thus, many analysts state that the implementation of the relevant law deprives American people of the right to control and regulate the costs of their medical service (Boyes and Melvin 89). Therefore, health insurance companies will receive a chance to impose higher costs for less medical care. Thus, the principal argument of the supporters of the Obamacare program that the new regulation provides equal terms for receiving the service seems to be irrelevant. In order to compensate for the reduced prices offered to particular social groups, health insurance companies will raise the costs of service for other people (Holahah and Garrett 2).