Final Project “increase the hospital moral”

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.

Using the paper written in Assignment 2 as a guide, incorporate feedback from your instructor and write a 9-10 page paper expanding on your planned change initiative and devise an implementation plan. You will have earned 20 practice experience hours for this activity; 10 hours should be spent communicating with your mentor throughout the course on the change project and 10 hours are spent on research for your project. Address the following points:
•The change you wish to initiate
•The rationale for the change, using supporting data
•The outcomes desired from the change
•The audience you need to convince
•The benefits to the institution
•Allocation of resources and potential budget requirements
•The group to lead the initiative —why these members
•The proposed timeline
•Measures of success.

Use APA formatting and include at least 5 scholarly references in addition to the textbook.

Final Project Rubric

Competency

10 points

7.5 points

5 points

0 points

Points Earned

Incorporates information and feedback from assignment 2 to create a detailed essay

Includes all elements and incorporates feedback from assignment 2

Includes some of the elements or some of the feedback from assignment 2

Lacks detail and/or does not incorporate feedback from assignment 2

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Explains rationale for the change supported by data from the literature

Clearly explains the rationale for the change and includes supporting data from the literature

States the rationale for the change with little supporting data

States a reason for the change but no supporting data

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Identifies desired outcomes derived from the change once implemented

Describes in detail the expected outcomes from the change

Gives a general description of what should be accomplished by the change

Vaguely describes what the change will accomplish

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Describes in detail who is selected as the target audience that needs convincing

Describes in detail who is selected as the target audience that needs convincing

Gives a general explanation of the target audience

Vaguely describes the target audience

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Describes benefits of the change to the institution

Describes in detail the benefits of the change to the institution

Describes some of the benefits of the change to the institution

Vaguely describes the benefits of the change

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Discusses resources needed and potential budget requirements

Describes in detail the resources needed and the potential budget requirements needed for the change

Identifies some of the resources needed for the change may not consider the potential budget requirements
Does not identify the resources or does not consider the potential budget requirements
No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Identifies the group that will lead the initiative, who the group members are and why they are chosen

Identifies the group that will lead the initiative, who the group members are and why they are chosen

Identifies the group that will lead the initiative but does not identify who the group members are or why they are chosen

Vaguely identifies the group that will lead the initiative

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Proposes a timeline for initiating the change with rationales

Proposes a detailed timeline for initiating the change with rationales

Proposes a timeline for initiating the change, weak rationale

No timeline identified or lacks rationale

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Identifies measures of success used to evaluate the outcome of the change

Identifies specific measures of success used to evaluate the outcome of the change

Identifies some measures of success used to evaluate the outcome of the change

Identified measures of success do not evaluate the outcome of the change

No paper submitted and/or content missing

/10

Competency

1 points

.75points

.5 point

0 point

Points Earned

Organization

Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.

Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support.

Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions.

Organization does not meet requirements.

/1

Grammar

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding

Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding

/1

Competency

1 points

.75 points

.5 point

0 point

Points Earned

References

References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary.

Adequate references.

Minimal use of appropriate references.

Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant.

/1

Competency

7 points

5 points

2 points

0 point

Points Earned

APA Format

Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA.

Minimal APA errors.

Many APA errors.

Complete lack of understanding.

/7

Total

/100