Evaluating a Case on prevalence of Diarrhea

This article is a review involving a case study where two sets of patients are evaluated with respect to the diarrhea. An ideal of this study evaluates two parameters where two distinctive situations are compared, and accorded appropriate conclusions. For instance, what is the level of infection among people who are either infected or safe from this disease? Therefore, this study design involves a case control since the health status of patients with respect to diarrhea effluents. Out of this article, I learn to evaluate the implications improving health standards towards the sustainability of quality service delivery to the sector. The parametric values that the empirical study reveals include health condition of patients in the before and after exposure to different health conditions (Schlesselman, 2007, p. 35). Case control are more popular than Cohort studies since case controls are simple and do not require longer duration of studies.  Cohort studies deal with evaluation on a given group of people with regard to a given infection, while case studies deal with examination of cases, people with diseases and those who are not infected.Evaluating a Case on prevalence of Diarrhea