discuss the advantages and disadvantages of social networking
Assignment: Social Networking

Permalink: https://nursingpaperslayers.com/assignment-social-networking/ ‎

In a 500-750 words, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of social networking and how it can be used in career development.

Include specific examples of social media in your discussion.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to the beginning of the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

Re: Module 1 Discussion Question 2

The mentoring relationship between mentors and mentees facilitates transfer of knowledge, skills, experience and wisdom gained from “past mistakes” and benefits the mentee in future career or business decisions (Evans-Galea & Galea, 2014, p. 26). Mentors advocate for their mentees, put them in contact to “meet the right people” who can help in their career decisions. In promoting the mentees’ talent and value forward within and outside the organization, the mentors can also become “sponsors” (Evans-Galea & Galea, 2014, p. 29).

From the mentor’s perspective, mentoring develops future leaders by fostering “professional development” and personal growth….organizations such as National Health Institute (NIH) saw increase in productivity and realized return on investment when mentoring is structured and built in the organization’s culture (( Evans-Galea & Galea, 2014, p. 29).

Mentees benefit from the mentoring process as it relates to positive career outcomes, when the mentoring relationship is based on respect, and supportive role modeling. In a study by Allen, Eby, Poteet, Lentz, & Lima, 2004 (as cited in Illies, Reiter-Palmon, 2018, p. 21), mentees reported successful careers, higher compensations and have high job satisfaction than individuals who were not mentored.

References

Evans-Galea, M. V., & Galea, C. A. (2014). The value of mentoring. Chemistry in Australia, (Oct 2014), 26. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsiec&AN=edsiec.669045282602795&site=eds-live&scope=site. Retrieved from

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsiec&AN=edsiec.669045282602795&site=eds-live&scope=site

Illies, M., Y. & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2018). The effect of value similarity on mentoring relationships and outcomes. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, (1), 20. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.24384/000468. Retrieved from

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.418483f7598449199b9168cba397359b&site=eds-live&scope=site

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

HLT-610 HLT-610-O500 Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages 200.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%)

Content 70.0%

Content/Resource Requirements: 50.0% Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.

Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated.

Research 20.0% No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%

Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.