Investigate one regulatory and one accrediting body pertinent to the faculty role in a higher education setting.
Prepare paper identifying the purpose and scope of these bodies in institutions in higher education.
Introduction
In the US the quality of higher education is addressed through three main means including accreditation program review and assessment. The accreditation function is done by several non-governmental authorized organizations where each of them has the responsibility of coming up with the criteria as well as procedures for evaluation of the quality of educational programs and institutions (Shelton 2008). Accreditation has the role of validating that a program or an institution meets minimum standards; nonetheless it does not offer an indication of the degree of program quality in relation to other programs. Program review is done internally at a time interval of every 5-10 years and considering a broad range of quantitative and qualitative indicators designed to offer feedback for program improvement. Finally program assessment is done by public agencies and organizations where each might require reporting against a particular set of indicators (Shpritz & OMara 2006). Assessment generally focuses on results entails a narrower set of measures and is always continuous rather than periodic. In this paper out of the many accrediting organizations we explore Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and out of the two recognition bodies: US Department of Education-government regulation and council of Higher-Education Accreditation (CHEA)-self-regulation we explore the latter.
Council of Higher-Education Accreditation (CHEA)
In a nutshell this organization is responsible of accrediting the accreditors of higher education in the US. The national organization was established to take this responsibility after the academy performed it own review of augmenting numbers of accreditors. This is generally referred to as self-regulation as the academy is regulation itself (Myrick & Yonge 2007). Nonetheless accreditation of other accrediting bodies ends reality of the academy regulation which comprises of the federal government accreditation of accrediting bodies via the department of Education. In doing so accountability is sought via reliance upon accreditation to perform the evaluation of individual programs and institutions in an almost boundless sea of mission. This accountability is largely sought via evaluation of literally various transactions (assessment of learning costs and jobs for graduates graduation rates) which legislation as well as regulations requires for qualification as an accrediting body commendable of opening gates to benefit from government funding.
.
For more on this paperclick here
To get a custom written paper in this or any other topicclick here
Expert consultations to help you with studiesWe have competent advisors in majority of main subjects
We are available around the clock and all over the world
We promise to meet your expectations or your money back
Place yourorder now