Warning You do not have permissions to perform this activity Assignment Week 5 | Focused Assessment CurrentAll Save Link Assignment Benchmark – Critique of Last Physical Assessment View Rubric Due Date: Sep 05, 2018 23:59:59       Max Points: 120 Details: Critique your last physical assessment on the basis of health promotion, health prevention, and comfort for you as the patient. Write a 750–1,000-word paper that addresses the following questions: 1. Did the provider evaluate lifestyle, nutrition, and exercise? 2. Did the provider explain the side effects of your medication? 3. Was there an agreement on the plan of care? 4. What was the environment like? Welcoming, comfortable, dirty, clean? 5. Did the provider answer your questions and perform a complete health history? 6. Was the physical assessment complete and correct? (Did the provider listen to your lung sounds through clothing?) 7. Did the provider see you in your street clothes or in a patient gown? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.   Top of Form Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked. New Attempt Graded Document Bottom of Form Title Author Attached Documents Final Submission No attempts made Result Instructor’s Comment Instructor’s Document Points Not submitted 0/120 (0%)    View Rubrics View All Attempts Title Author Attached Documents Citation Report Similarity Index Final Submission No attempts made Error Details   Top of Form Bottom of Form Top of Form Bottom of Form Top of Form Apply Rubrics Benchmark – Critique of Last Physical Assessment   1 No Submission 0.00% 2 Unsatisfactory 75.00% 3 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% 4 Satisfactory 88.00% 5 Good 92.00% 6 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content   20.0 %Physical Environment of the Health Care Facility None. Description of the health care facility related to comfort and welcome is either not present or incomplete. Assignment criteria has not been met. Minimally describes the health care facility related to comfort and welcome. Data lacks details and/or is incomplete. Discussion significantly lacks depth. Outlines the health care facility related to comfort and welcome. Statements may lack depth of understanding or detail. Provides a basic clear description with minimal evidence of the health care facility related to comfort and welcome. Thoroughly presents complete information on the physical environment of the health care facility related to comfort and welcome. Describes in-depth and with supporting evidence. 15.0 %Staff Provider and Comfort Level Description None. Description of the staff including the provider is either not present or incomplete. Assignment criteria has not been met. Minimally describes the staff including the provider. Data lacks details and/or is incomplete. Discussion significantly lacks depth. Presents an outline of the staff roles including the provider. States the comfort the client (you) has with the staff. Statements may lack depth of understanding or detail. Provides a basic clear description with minimal evidence of the staff including the provider. Briefly describes the comfort of the client (you). Thoroughly presents complete information on staff including the provider. Describes in-depth and with supporting evidence the comfort of the client (you). 20.0 %Assessment (Health Promotion, Health Prevention, and Accuracy and Completeness) None. Does not describe the assessment regarding health promotion, health prevention, and accuracy and completeness of the visit. Minimally describes the assessment regarding health promotion, health prevention, and accuracy and completeness of the visit. Data lacks details and/or is incomplete. Discussion significantly lacks depth. Outlines the assessment regarding health promotion, health prevention, and accuracy and completeness of the visit. Statements may lack depth of understanding or detail. Provides a basic description of the assessment regarding health promotion, health prevention, and accuracy and completeness of the visit. Some details are presented. Clearly and comprehensively describes the assessment regarding health promotion, health prevention, and accuracy and completeness of the visit. Descriptions are in-depth and supported by evidence. 15.0 %Closure of the Encounter Description None. Description of the closure of the encounter is either not present or incomplete. Assignment criteria has not been met. Minimally describes the closure of the encounter. Data lacks details and/or is incomplete. Discussion significantly lacks depth. Presents an outline on the closure of the encounter. States the possible side effects, medications, tests, and follow-up requirements that were suggested. Statements may lack depth of understanding or detail. Provides a basic clear description on the closure of the encounter. Briefly outlines the possible side effects, medications, tests, and follow-up requirements that were suggested. Thoroughly presents complete information on the closure of the encounter. Explains possible side effects, medications, tests, and follow-up requirements that were suggested. Describes in-depth and with supporting evidence. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness   7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose None. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction None. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.) None. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format   5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.) None. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style.) None. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage   Bottom of Form