Analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas.

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

Welcome to NURS 6050-3 Policy & Advocacy for Population Health
Posted on: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 10:45:05 AM EST

Welcome to the course. We are in an interesting and exciting time in relation to policy and advocacy. My recommendation to you is that you read your syllabus completely and review each modules assignments and rubrics. It is your responsibility to submit your assignments and discussions on time. Please use the Writing Center if you feel you have issues with writing. Tools available to you are Grammarly and SafeAssign.

To Prepare:

Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.

Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.

Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.

Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)

Identify the Population Health concern you selected. Opioid Addiction
Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. The opioid epidemic is the health concern that I have selected because it affects families across all socioeconomic statuses. As nurses, we assess pain just as often as we take vital signs of our patients. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are in place to bring forth comfort. However, pain management becomes challenging with the rise in chronic medical conditions and it is very easy to become dependent on narcotics. Drug dependency is a growing problem in the United States.
Administration (President Name) Donald Trump Barack Obama William Clinton
Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. To build a stronger healthier drug-free society and reduce drug demand through education.

To expand access to treatment and prescription drug monitoring, safe disposal of unused drugs, and accelerate research related to pain, opioids, and their misuse.

Increase awareness and education to reduce stigma and curb addiction. Provide communities with the resources to tackle the epidemic. Foster meaningful partnerships with organizations for sustained involvement.
Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue. The administration secured $6 billion in funding to support, prevent, and provide recovery activities. Funds allocated established help centers and institutions for individuals affected.

The administration allocated $1.1 billion for individuals wanting treatment so that they can get it anywhere. The administration allocated $12.2 billion in anti-drug efforts involving prevention, drug treatment, and enforcement.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. The Trump administration works hard to keep dangerous drugs out of the United States.

They also want to prosecute negligent practitioners and strengthen criminal penalties. Available to people struggling are resources to aid in recovery.

Clinicians will need to check a PDMP before prescribing an opioid. This will help to identify opioid use disorder as previously prescribed narcotics will be listed.

The administration will also allocate funds for evidence-based research to improve knowledge gaps in proper identification and treatment.

National prescription drug take back day also provides safe and effective ways of disposing of opioids.

The Clinton foundation partnered with Kaléo and Adapt Pharm to lower the cost of Narcan, an opioid effect reversing agent.

Community faith leaders were equipped with the resources and tools to serve the community as trusted leaders.

Partnership with Johns Hopkins Bloomberg and Public Health as well as Harvard Medical School used evidence-based research to implement interventions and education.

Resources

(2006). Fact sheet: Obama administration takes more actions to address the prescription opioid and heroin epidemic. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/07/06/fact-sheet-obama-administration-takes-more-actions-address-prescription?fbclid=IwAR3quBqMDuhsCyfZTGcxOytxkIPNaT7LKrZyHhnBKWE72T9mvL1hBnB2n6I

(2018). President Donald J. Trump’s initiative to stop opioid abuse and reduce drug supply and demand. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-initiative-stop-opioid-abuse-reduce-drug-supply-demand-2/

(n.d). Clinton health matters initiative: Substance use disorders & recovery. Retrieved from https://www.clintonfoundation.org/our-work/clinton-health-matters-initiative/programs/substance-use-disorders-recovery/our-approach

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.

Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.

Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

(A draft of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid should be posted to the Module 1 Discussion Board by Day 3 of Week 1.)

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT on
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information, you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

Based on the feedback that you received from your colleagues in the Discussion, revise Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid and Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis.

Then, using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. You can use Microsoft Word or PowerPoint to create your Fact Sheet or Talking Point Brief. Be sure to address the following:

Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Important:

*******The response needs to fully integrate at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided. I would recommend combining your Agenda Grid Comparison and Fact Sheet together in one document. If you upload separately, be sure to attach to the assignment link at the same time********

***Final Agenda Grid Comparison, Analysis, and Fact Sheet Required References****

Be sure to answer all the questions associated with the Agenda Comparison Grid for your final assignment:

-Identify which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the -healthcare issue you selected.

-How does the healthcare issue get on the agenda and how does it stay there?

-Who was the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected?

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)

· Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)

· Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)

· Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”

o “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)

· DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002

· Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Kingdon, J. W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting, with applications. Law Review, M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331).

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148. doi:10.1177/1527154417728514

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Retrieved September 20, 2018.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a

https://www.usa.gov/executive-departments

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-trump-administration/the-cabinet/

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid

Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

it frequently refers to itself as a nonpartisan media operat ion. Descriptive words and phrases that predominate on th.is organization’swebsite include social activism, community organizing, justice, equity , and protect the disildvm1taged-typical of a liberal or progressive ideo lo gy. Nevertheless, th e word “liberal” is never used on thissite.

Who is setti ng the agenda? Ron Pollack, founder of Families USA, has been most important in setting its agenda. He stepped down from his position as director /chief executive officer in March 2017. He is a well-known fire­ brand in Washington, D.C., who has successfully argued to the Supreme Court (he is a lawyer) for secure food aid for low -income Americans as well as for federal li tigation that resulted in the creation of the Women, Infants, and Children (W!C) program for malnourished mothers and infants. The board of directors for Families USA includes a Catholic nun with a history of activism for soc_ial justice, leaders from humanitarian foundations., a physician who has worked for a Democratic senator an d governor, a librarian who is a champion for Medicaid, a faculty memb er of Harvard Medical School, the director of a large labor union, and academics with backgrounds indicating liberal philosophies.

What are Families USA ‘s interests? The main inte rest is to secure affordable, quality health care for all people in the United States. 1be organization pro­ motes a patient – and communit y-centered health system.

When was the site updated? A blog provides analysis of current policy debates on healthcare finance; entries are no more than 3 days old. Other resources arc much older-avail.ableslide shows are l l months old.

Where does Families USA get its funding? ProPublica reports that Families USA’s 2014 990 tax return showed revenues of $7 million . Donors include the Kellogg Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and others. As you can see, learning about Ron Pollock, finding the 990s, and discover­ ing which causes the Kellogg Foundation and other donors usually support takes some digging.

Summing it up, you shou ld never assume tha t any reference or source is un­ biased. Do not take content as factual until you have determined what the agenda and motivations of the au thors or publishers may be. This kind of critical thinking requires you to be a skeptical, soph is ticated user of data and information. This is not to say that you cannot use references from organizations such as Heritage Foundation or Fami lies USA; however, seeking balance in your understanding is important. Balance your knowledge by reading and exploring a variety of points of view. As a starting point, TABLE 12-1 describes the five major political parties (and their general ideology) in the United States.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-

-Identify a population health concern

-Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
The response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
The response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Identification and description of a population health concern is missing or incomplete.
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-

– Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.

– Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.

– Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least 3 resources are used.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response vaguely describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 2 resources are used.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately describes the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 1 resource is used.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The description of the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue is missing. No resources are used.
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:

-Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?

-How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?

-Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
-The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
-Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
– The response clearly and accurately identifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
-The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency which may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
-Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected health care issue is inaccurate.
-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.
-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.
-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
-Identification of the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Narrative:

Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy-maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.

-Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

-Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
Creates a well-developed, accurate, and narrative.
The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.

Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
Creates an accurate and thorough narrative.
The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.

Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
Creates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.
The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

The responses partially justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric