Examine potential power analysis contributions that serve to improve the advanced nursing practice environment.

Discussion: Examining Potential Power Analysis

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT;Discussion: Examining Potential Power Analysis

NR714 Week 5 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2017 November Week 5: Power Analysis in Advanced Nursing Practice 1515 unread replies.3030 replies. Examine potential power analysis contributions that serve to improve the advanced nursing practice environment. dq 2 Week 5: Reliability Versus Validity in Advanced Nursing Practice 2121 unread replies.2929 replies. Examine potential reliability and validity contributions that serve to improve the advanced nursing practice environment. NR714 Week 6 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2017 November dq 1 Week 6: Differentiating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 11 unread reply.4242 replies. Differentiate selected quantitative versus qualitative research designs that shape a preferred evidence-based practice environment. dq 2 Week 6: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Procedures 11 unread reply.3232 replies. Differentiate selected quantitative versus qualitative procedures including appropriate data collection, levels of measurement, and sampling considerations. NR714 Week 7 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2017 November dq 1 Week 7: Issues Related to Descriptive Analysis 2424 unread replies.3535 replies. Formulate effective strategies for descriptive analysis that contribute to evidence-based quality improvement. dq 2 Week 7: Nonparametric Versus Parametric, Inferential, and Multivariate Analysis 11 unread reply.3838 replies. Formulate effective strategies in planning and selection of appropriate statistical analysis that contribute to evidence-based quality improvement. NR714 Week 8 Discussion Latest 2017 November Week 8: Using Outcomes Assessment to Differentiate Original Research From Quality Improvement 1010 unread replies.1010 replies. Differentiate original research from quality improvement using outcomes assessment in advanced nursing practice. NR714 Week 5 Systematic and Integrative Review Latest 2017 November Systematic and Integrative Review of Selected Practice Query Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this applicationis to provide the student an opportunity to develop a systematic and integrative review of selected practice query. Course Outcomes This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following Course Outcomes: CO1: Formulate PICOT/PICoT questions relevant to advanced nursing practice (PO #3). CO2: Utilize comprehensive systematic-review skills necessary for evidence-based practice (PO #5). CO3: Critically appraise level and quality of evidence related to a selected advanced nursing practice issue (PO #3). CO5: Evaluate appropriateness of a qualitative research design for a selected PICoT question (PO #3). CO6: Evaluate appropriateness of a quantitative research design for a selected PICOT question (PO #3). CO7: Evaluate appropriateness of an economic research design for a selected economic appraisal of evidence (PO #3). CO9: Analyze qualitative, quantitative, and economic data for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence (PO #3). CO10: Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence (PO #5). Points This assignment is worth a total of 265 points. Due Date Submit your completed assignment by Sunday11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5, as directed. Requirements 1. To complete this application, you will need to access to the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. You may access these databases through the Chamberlain College of Nursing Online Library. The library has a main menu available at http://library.chamberlain.edu/index.htmlwith a link for Research Help in the left-hand menu. 2. TheSystematic and Integrative Review of Selected Practice Querypaper is worth 250 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 3. Create your report using Microsoft Word(a part of Microsoft Office), which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Nursing documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a Microsoft Word document because it will end in .docx. 4. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this project may be posted under the Q&A forum. 5. The length of the project report is to be no less than 6 and no greater than 8 pages excluding title page and reference pages. 6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface): Note: Introduction—Write an introduction to thesystematic and integrative review of selected practice query, but do not useIntroduction as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in thePublication manual of the American Psychological Association(2010, p. 63).APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered): a. Description of systematic and integrative review of selected practice query(both integrative and systematic review of evidence) b. Presentation of systematic and integrative review of selected practice query analysisincluding quantitative, qualitative, and economic evidence c. Conclusion Preparing the Project Report The following are best practices for preparing this project report: 1. When introducing the systematic and integrative review of selected practice query, be sure to include pertinent background information regarding the topic (who, what, where, when, and why). 2. When describing the selected practice query, be sure to fully identify and address evidence using a synthesis (integrative review citing areas of agreement and disagreement among authors) approach for the written summary and embed or attach the evidence table (systematic review citing leveling and grading of evidence) using the template found in Course Resources. 3. When presenting the systematic and integrative review of selected practice query analysis, be sure to fully incorporate evidence fromquantitative, qualitative, and economic sources.