Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050

Case study : A 19-year old female presents to your clinic with complaints of nausea and vomiting every morning for the past week.
May 26, 2022
Discuss The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation
May 26, 2022

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050

https://nursingpaperslayers.com/assignment-advocating-for-the-nursing-role-in-program-design-and-implementation-nurs-6050/

You explored how professional nurses can become active in policymaking during the Module 4 Discussion. Evaluation of the results is a vital component of any policy design. Are you at ease with the prospect of becoming involved in such matters?

Some nurses may be averse to participating in policy evaluation. The inclination may be to concentrate on patient care and well-being; some nurses may feel unprepared to engage in policy and political activities. However, as previously stated, who better than nurses to advocate for patients and effective programs and policies? Patient advocates are already present in meetings with physicians and senior leadership; why not with government and regulatory agencies?

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

Both the honeyguide bird and the honey badger, as their names imply, have a fondness for honey. Honeyguide birds are experts at locating beehives but struggle to gain access to the honey contained within. Although honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives, they are not always successful. However, according to Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050, these two honey-loving species have learnt to work cooperatively to accomplish their goals. Honey badgers are guided to freshly discovered hives by the honeyguide bird. After the honey badger has emptied the hive, the honey guide bird enters safely to consume the remaining honey.

As with honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and other health professionals from a variety of specialties can—and should—collaborate to create beneficial programs. Nurses bring a variety of specializations to the table, making them ideal partners for professionals with a variety of specialties. When nurses adopt the necessary leadership roles in the healthcare system, these collaborations may more effectively plan and deliver highly successful programs that accomplish objectives.

You will demonstrate this style of leadership in this Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050 Assignment by pushing for a healthcare program. Additionally, you will advocate for the nurse’s collaborative participation in the design and execution of this program. Assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication about your perspective on the nurse’s involvement in the design and implementation of innovative healthcare programs.

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050
Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation

Interview Transcript of Responses

Question: Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?

Response: As a utilization management nurse, I am currently tasked with the responsibility of reviewing how health care services are provided with cost efficiency, quality, and within compliance (Healthcare Support, 2020). To ensure the attainment of the job objectives, I comply with the organization’s utilization

Assignment Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050
Assignment Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050

management program called Milliman guidelines (MCG guidelines). MCG connotes evidence-based protocols that support health care providers in decision making at point of care. The cost of this program can only be determined by the management of the hospital as the details cannot be disclosed to the nurses but, they tend to differ from among the health care settings. The projected outcomes of the utilization management programs include identification of mistakes, enhancement of safety, reduction of waste, lowering health care costs, and reduction of incidences of re-hospitalization and length of hospital stay.

Question: Who is your target population?

Response: The target population in this program is patients who visit the health care facility to seek health care services and the health care providers who provides the health care services to the patients.

Question: What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

Response: For a nurse to provide input for the design of this program, the nurse as a role to be familiarize with program. Once the nurse is familiar with the program including its design, the nurse can engage the program’s medical directors to give their perspectives on the design and highlight their concerns about the design of the program (Valaitis et al., 2017). For instance, after reviewing the manner of approving visits in our health care facility, I realized that many visits were pending approval. Consequently, we utilized the MCG protocols in the facility and approved significant amount of visits. However, some visits specifically required endorsement by the medical director based on the appropriateness and necessity. As a utilization management nurse, I was raised this concern with the medical director at the facility who organized for an urgent meeting with relevant stakeholders. The visits approval issues were addressed at the meeting including the best ways to increase the visit approval efficiency.

Question: What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?

Response: Nurses play tends to play critical role as patient advocates (Gerber, 2018). My role as an advocate for my target population in this program is to ensure that patient gets quality, cost effective health care services that is compliant with the established organizational guidelines. I will advocate for this objectives by consistently reviewing and auditing the patient health care files to ensure that patients only get necessary procedures, effective treatment, and reduction in longer hospital stays. Moreover, I will apply proper utilization of critical thinking skills and knowledge to advocate for improved quality of care and life and prevent patient intricacies during the hospital stay period. Moreover, I will utilize the managed care strategies to enable health insurance providers to manage the health cost by evaluating the suitability prior to adoption of payment through evidence-based protocols or criteria. Currently, I have no input to make in the design decision of the program but I can impact the design by making proposals on the pattern that I observe. The patterns are crucial in assisting the utilization management committee to observe the patterns and determine what can be done to the design to help in informing better patients’ outcomes.

Question: What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?

Response: Nurses play a vital role in the implementation of the health care program (Harris, Roussel & Thomas, 2016). In this program, it is my duty to implement all the changes made in the design of the program or gets acclimatized with any new changes that may be associated with the program implementation. Every patient requires unique health care services that are oriented to the individual needs. Therefore, as a nurses I have a responsibility to advocate for the patients when implementing the facility’s utilization program. This role may differ with between design and implementation since the top management and sales has a lot to do with the program’s design. The department that deals with compliance is equally crucial in guaranteeing adherence to the policy, laws, and regulations of the health care program.

Question: Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

Response: The success of this program requires the involvement of all team members of health care team in the health facility. The hospital administration is crucial in setting a favorable environment for change implementation in the organization. On the other hand, the medical directors are crucial in providing assistance to nurses make decisions regarding the utilization review and health facility. For instance, where the patients require interdisciplinary collaboration to influence positive outcomes, the interdisciplinary collaboration should be facilitated to achieve the desired outcomes. The medical directors and utilization committee also play a vital role in formulating proposals and decisions on the intricate cases involving patient care.

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and Implementation NURS 6050 References

Gerber, L. (2018). Understanding the nurse’s role as a patient advocate. Nursing2019, 48(4), 55-58. DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000531007.02224.65

Harris, J. L., Roussel, L. A., & Thomas, T. (2016). Initiating and sustaining the clinical nurse leader role: A practical guide. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Healthcare Support. (2020). Utilization Management Nurse. Healthcaresupport.com. Retrieved 29 September 2020, from https://www.healthcaresupport.com/utilization-management-nurse/.

Valaitis, R. K., Carter, N., Lam, A., Nicholl, J., Feather, J., & Cleghorn, L. (2017). Implementation and maintenance of patient navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a scoping literature review. BMC health services research, 17(1), 116. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2046-1

Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.

In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.
Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.
Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

In a 2- to 3-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
Who is your target population?
What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?
By Day 7 of Week 8
Submit your interview transcript.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your written transcript using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design
When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

To Prepare:

Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.
By Day 3 of Week 7
Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 7
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 7 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7
To participate in this Discussion:

Week 7 Discussion

Discussion 2: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making
Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events. Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.

What types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? Empathetic, organized, hard-working, or advocate would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?

Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence, policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation.

To Prepare:

Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.
Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.
By Day 3 of Week 8
Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 8
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’* posts by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8
To submit your Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

Next Module
To go to the next Module:

Module 5

Module 5: Program/Policy Evaluation (Weeks 9-10)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Program Policy and Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in program/policy evaluations
Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in program/policy evaluations
Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of program/policy evaluations
Describe healthcare program/policy outcomes
Analyze healthcare program/policy evaluations
Analyze the role of the nurse advocate in program/policy evaluation
Due By
Assignment
Week 9, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 9, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 9, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Week 10, Days 1-6
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 10, Day 7
Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.

Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991.

Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003

Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Program Design

In a 2- to 3-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions.
· Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?

· Who is your target population?

· What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

· What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

· What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program.

Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population.

Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples.

Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected.

Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design.

Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program.

Response provides an accurate description of the target population.

Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples.

Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected.

Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design.

Points Range: 31 (31%) – 35 (35%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program.

Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples.

Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing.

Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Program Implementation
· What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?

· Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this?
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.

Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples.

Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation.

Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, and may include some specific examples.

Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected.

The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.

Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples.

Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete.

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 27 (27%)
Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Program Design In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions. · Tell us about a healthcare program within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program? · Who is your target population? · What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples? · What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples? · What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design? Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%) Response provides a clear and complete summary of the healthcare program, including an accurate and detailed description of the costs and projected outcomes of the program. Response provides a clear and accurate description that fully describes the target population. Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including specific examples. Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions as well as fully explaining impacts to program design. Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%) Response provides a summary of the healthcare program, including a description of the costs and project outcomes of the program. Response provides an accurate description of the target population. Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, including some examples. Response provides an accurate description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected. Response provides an accurate explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and somewhat explains impacts to program design. Points Range: 31 (31%) – 35 (35%) Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague or incomplete or does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program. Description of the target population is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program is vague, inaccurate, or does not include specific examples. Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague or inaccurate. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Response provides a summary of the healthcare program that is vague and inaccurate, does not include costs or projected outcomes of the program, or is missing. Description of the target population is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of the program, and specific examples is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Description of the role of the nurse advocate for the target population for the healthcare program selected is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the advocate’s role influences design decisions and impacts to program design is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Program Implementation · What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?· Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why you think this? Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%) Response provides a clear, accurate, and complete explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, including specific examples. Response provides an accurate and detailed description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided. Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Response provides an accurate explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation. Response provides an accurate explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs, and may include some specific examples. Response provides and accurate description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided. Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete. Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague or inaccurate and/or does not include specific examples. Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is inaccurate or incomplete. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 27 (27%) Explanation of the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of how the role of the nurse is different between design and implementation of healthcare programs is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Description of the members of a healthcare team needed to implement the program selected is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100