Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545 Scenario: Pursuant to the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill, the United States will be challenged to bring into its health care population some 32 million more patients. Formerly, many of these patients were uninsured. Some of these patients were seen and treated in safety-net hospitals, but mostly in emergency rooms. Reliable, independent studies have shown that this population is low income and is disproportionately made up of ethnic and racial minorities; however, it is important to point out that due to the economic downturn at the turn of the decade surrounding 2010, this 32 million will include a significant number of non-minority unemployed individuals. Consider that health care institutions must move beyond simply taking in and treating the sick and injured who come through the door. In the near future, the health of the community will be measured in terms of low disease burden, high vaccination rates, controlled chronic disease rates, healthier life styles, and a better educated public. Clearly, the impacts to the health care system will have to be addressed. Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

2) Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that describes the roles and responsibilities of health care management in addressing this pressing dilemma. Apply the following questions to generate your conclusions about how you would proceed:

a) How do the considerations under the concept of governance apply?

b) What are the major financial issues being faced?

c) What are the major physical issues being faced?

d) What are the major demographic issues being faced?

3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HCA-545 HCA-545-O500 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review 80.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
Describe the Roles and Responsibilities of Health Care Management Relating to the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill 40.0% Does not demonstrate understanding of the relevant issues surrounding the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill.Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545.  Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the topic, and does not develop effective answers to the questions. Provides little if any rationale. Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the relevant issues surrounding the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the topic, developing weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale. Demonstrates a marginal, but adequate knowledge of the relevant issues surrounding the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill. Demonstrates some slight misunderstanding of the assigned questions. A basic level of critical thinking is evident. Mediocre analysis of the issues. Lacks relevance. Few connections are made; ideas are presented in isolation. Does not include examples or descriptions. Demonstrates an acceptable working knowledge of the relevant issues surrounding the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill. Clearly explains how these issues are connected. A sufficient level of critical thinking is evident. Answers the assigned questions. Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples. Demonstrates a thorough and extensive knowledge of all relevant issues surrounding the 2010 Health Care Reform Bill. Specific details are introduced and thoughtfully developed. Cogently explains how relevant issues are connected. A profound level of critical thinking is evident. Background issues are presented when necessary to provide context and a deeper level of understanding. Thoroughly answers the assigned questions and develops a strong rationale. Ideas are fresh, pertinent and fully illuminated. Introduces appropriate examples. Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

Integrates Information From Outside Resources Into the Body of Paper 30.0% Does not use references, examples, or explanations. Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references. Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas. Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully, analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.

Assignment Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style.) 5.0% No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Assignment: 2010 Health Care Reform Bill Impact Review HCA 545