Week 2 case study journal instructions

Assignment 2: Clinical Skills Self-Assessment
September 1, 2022
Excess inventory weighs on retail sales and prices
September 1, 2022

Week 2 case study journal instructions

Week 2 case study journal instructions

 

After you view the case study, reflect upon what you have learned and how it is related to the learning materials. Compare the case study to your nursing practice and give a similar example from your experience in which you might have run into staffing issues.

Submit your entry by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Your reflection content should be a minimum of 500 words, equal to five to six paragraphs, and is worth 50 points.

 

Rubric

NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (1)

NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
20 to >17.8 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions.

17.8 to >15.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions.

15 to >11.8 pts

Below Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.

11.8 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

 20 pts
15 to >13.35 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

13.35 to >11.25 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

11.25 to >8.85 pts

Below Expectations

Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

8.85 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

 15 pts
10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

5.9 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

 10 pts
5 to >4.45 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

4.45 to >3.75 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.

3.75 to >2.95 pts

Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

2.95 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

 5 pts
Total Points: 50