NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving

NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving

https://nursingpaperslayers.com/nurs-6050-discussion-the-application-of-data-to-problem-solving/

In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.

Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.

In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving
NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving

Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap.
By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

By Day 6 of Week 1https://nursingpaperslayers.com/nurs-6050-discussion-the-application-of-data-to-problem-solving/

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, asking questions to help clarify the scenario and application of data, or offering additional/alternative ideas for the application of nursing informatics principles.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:

Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
· Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.
The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.

The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.

Includes: 1 or fewer resources.
· Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.

Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.
· Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 Discussion The Application of Data to Problem-Solving The Application of Data to Problem-Solving I have found your information on IPASS in the EMR to be very interesting. In the last staff meeting on the inpatient Behavioral Health unit that I work in, it was announced that research was being done to improve the change of shift report, as well as report being given by the Emergency Room for new admissions or medical floor if the patient being admitted from Medical. Bedside reporting is something that we currently do but it is very inconsistent. Certain things that I see frequently not passed on are if someone is on detoxification protocols (such as CIWA and COWS)), and any discontinuation, new or increase in medication. With the use of IPASS or a program like IPASS, a tool can be created in Epic directed more toward behavioral health and detox, it could prevent nurses from not doing a proper change of shift or admission report as it would be embedded in Epic. It is just as easy for things to be missed in Epic because there are so many places to look such as order history, orders, nursing communication (which are not specifically orders but are tasks requested by providers, and hospitalist consults. So, if there was a tool at the change of shift that connected all new or pending tasks, lab results, and orders over a 24-48 hour period it could make it less likely for valuable information to not be passed on, this tool could also help providers that are coming on over the weekend to care for patients. There was a study launched on initiation of IPASS with the goal of improvement of quality of care according to Studeny et. al (2017). Before developing IPASS a survey was given to staff and clients to identify what was lacking in the change of shift reporting. With the implementation of these programs, quality of care improved exponentially, particularly in summary and diagnosis of patients, the severity of the patient, and synthesizing all information and data in a timely manner (Studeny et. al 2017). IPASS incorporates all aspects of nursing informatics including cognitive, computer, nursing science, and information technology (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). As nurses, we must always strive to incorporate the most up-to-date tools at our disposal to enhance the quality of care and communication with our colleagues and patients. References McGonigle, D., Mastrian, K.G. (2017). Introduction to information, information science, and information systems. Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge (4th ed., pp. 20-33). Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781284142990 Scott Studeny, Lauren Burley, Kelsey Cowen, Melanie Akers, Kelly O’Neill, & Susan L Flesher. (2017). Quality improvement regarding handoff. SAGE Open Medicine, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117729098