Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content
Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent 90%–100% Good 80%–89% Fair 70%–79% Poor 0%–69%
For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Points: Points Range: 50 (50%) – 55 (55%) Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 44 (44%) – 49 (49%) Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 39 (39%) – 43 (43%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 38 (38%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing. Feedback:
Propose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples. Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing. Feedback:
Describe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors. Feedback:Show Descriptions Show Feedback For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 50 (50%) - 55 (55%) Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Good 80%–89% 44 (44%) - 49 (49%) Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Fair 70%–79% 39 (39%) - 43 (43%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 38 (38%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing. Feedback: Propose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 18 (18%) - 20 (20%) Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided. Good 80%–89% 16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided. Fair 70%–79% 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 13 (13%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing. Feedback: Describe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. -- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation -- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 70%–79% 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting - The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 70%–79% 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors. Feedback: Total Points: 100 Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric