How might you use Bloom’s taxonomy as a tool when writing?

The Doctoral Focus

Think through the reasons that motivated you to enroll in the Capella program for a PhD in psychology. For your initial post in this discussion, answer the following questions:

Why are you here? Describe your primary motivations for pursuing this program.
What elements in your background, experience, and thinking have led you to taking this direction?
Which learning model best describes you right now, considering the scholar-practitioner model?
How do you think your learning in this program will be different from your learning in your master’s program? Choose a specific situation that you recall from your master’s program, and illustrate the differences you expect.
What are you trying to become? Think about what you have thought about for your future, and reflect on what you have read in this unit.
When you have earned your doctorate, what will it enable you to do that you cannot do now?
What will it mean to you?
How will it change your contributions to society and community?
How will you make sure that you can accomplish your goal? Consider what you have learned in this unit about the requirements for earning a PhD, about the elements of the program, and about the other aspects of your life. Consider the time management action plan you prepared as part of the second study in this unit, as well as the recommendations in Chapter 11 of your Graduate Savvy text. What will it take for you to succeed? To what extent are you prepared to take charge of your learning, to challenge yourself, and to handle all of the time commitments required?
The expected result of this discussion is the opportunity to share these ideas with your peers, ideally, to continue to post back and forth with others in your specialization. However, do not feel obligated to share any information which, due to its nature, you consider too personal or private.

Refer to Attributes and Evaluation of Discussion Contributions uploaded below to learn how the instructor will evaluate your discussion participation throughout this course and as a self-assessment guide for your discussion posts and responses.

DISCUSSION 2

Bloom’s Taxonomy
Learning to think critically is a skill that you will need long after your time at Capella. It can help you to make decisions, form opinions, and evaluate information. One critical thinking model is Bloom’s taxonomy. After reading the Granello’s 2001 article, “Promoting Cognitive Complexity in Graduate Written Work: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy As a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Literature Reviews,” uploaded below from this unit’s second study, respond to the following questions:

What do you see as strengths and weaknesses of Bloom’s taxonomy?
How might you use Bloom’s taxonomy as a tool when writing? How could it help you evaluate your own writing?
How could you apply Bloom’s taxonomy to research articles you read?
Discussion 3

Before you begin your post, read about the following three theories from the Reading Excerpts From Scholarly Articles document given in the resources:

David McClelland’s achievement motivation theory.
Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
Frederick Herzberg’s motivation theory.
Make sure you understand the ideas advanced by each author (knowledge and comprehension), and imagine how these ideas could be applied (application). Then, for your initial post in this discussion:

Analyze each author’s model to determine the most important key concepts in each.
Compare and contrast briefly the three sets of key concepts.
Synthesize the ideas of all of the authors to identify 2–3 overriding themes that have emerged from this research in human motivation.
Attributes and Evaluation of Discussion Contributions

Learner Guidelines for Evaluation of Discussion Contributions
All discussion contributions will be read by your instructor each week. The instructor will provide feedback to you regarding your discussion postings. Expecting that every discussion posting and response contain all of the attributes of an exemplary discussion posting is setting a high standard for both you and the instructor. This level of high performance is the standard expected of graduate learners at Capella.

Attributes and Evaluation of Discussion Contributions
Attributes of an Exemplary Discussion Contribution or Response:
1. The discussion contribution or response clearly addresses the content issue(s) presented by the question.

2. The discussion contribution or response includes the appropriate level(s) of critical analysis.

3. The discussion contribution or response includes pertinent course and disciplinary concepts, theories, or materials, and applies them correctly.

4. The discussion contribution or response provides validation and support by including relevant examples and supporting evidence, as appropriate.

5. The discussion contribution or response stimulates fellow learners to clarify, extend, and strengthen their dialogue.

6. The discussion contribution or response is concise, clearly organized, and well structured.

7. The discussion contribution or response uses grammar, usage, and mechanics expected of graduate level composition and expression.

8. All citations and references adhere to APA 6th edition style.

9. The discussion contribution or response fosters collaboration with fellow learners and communicates in a manner that respects the dignity and integrity of fellow learners and the instructor.

10. The discussion response meaningfully supplements and extends consideration of the topic by including one of more of the following: new information, questions, constructive or corrective feedback, or alternative viewpoints.

For additional details regarding discussion participation and contributions, please consult the Professional Communications and Writing Guide.