Uncategorized
Content
(be specific)
Example – The Food Pyramid has five food groups which are….
Healthy foods from each group are….
Unhealthy foods containing a lot of sugar or fat are…. Strategies/Methods
(label and describe)
Example – Interactive poster presentation of the Food Pyramid. After an explanation of the poster and each food category, allow students to place
pictures of foods on the correct spot on the pyramid. Also, have the class analyze what a child had for lunch by putting names of foods on the poster
and discussing what food group still needs to be eaten throughout day.
1.
1. 1.
2.
2. 2.
3.
3. 3.
4.
4. 4.
Creativity: How was creativity applied in the teaching methods/strategies?
Planned Evaluation of Objectives (Outcome Evaluation): Describe what you will measure for each objective and how.
1)
2)
3)
4)
Planned Evaluation of Goal: Describe how and when you could evaluate the overall effectiveness of your teaching plan.
Planned Evaluation of Lesson and Teacher (Process Evaluation):
Barriers: What are potential barriers that may arise during teaching and how will those be handled?
Communication: How will you begin your presentation (hook them in)? How will you end your presentation (go out with a bang)? What nonverbal
communication techniques will you employ?
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.
Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
83.00% 4
Good
94.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Identification of Focus for Community Teaching Focus of community teaching is not identified or is incomplete. Focus of community teaching is
unclear or inconsistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings. Focus of community teaching is clear, but rationale for
selection is not included. Focus of community teaching is clear, with a detailed explanation of rationale for selection. Focus of community
teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings, and supported by explanation of rationale.
50.0 %Detailed and Comprehensive Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Community teaching proposal is omitted or incomplete. Community teaching
proposal is unclear or inconsistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings, demographic, or the scope of community-based resources.
Community teaching proposal is clear with a complete summary of each area listed in the assignment criteria. Community teaching proposal is clearly
described and is well supported by evidence from current literature and statistical/demographic data published on the community. There is a detailed
summary of all required areas of the work plan. Community teaching proposal is detailed and comprehensive, with supportive evidence and a detailed
description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers. Evidence from current literature and statistical/demographic data published on the
community thoroughly supports the proposal in all required areas of the work plan.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Organization of Proposal, Paragraph Development and Transitions Organization of proposal is disjointed. Paragraphs and transitions consistently
lack unity and coherence. There are no apparent connections between ideas. Transitions are inappropriate or lacking. Some degree of organization is
evident. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Paragraphs are generally
competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between
paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Proposal is well-organized and logical. Ideas progress and
relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in
command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 %Proposal template is applied correctly. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template
is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct,
although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are
correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and
lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully
inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are
complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
The following part is missing
This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this
assignment should include:
1. Summary of teaching plan
2. Epidemiological rationale for topic
3. Evaluation of teaching experience
4. Community response to teaching
5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
83.00% 4
Good
94.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing.
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague. Focus of
community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided. Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent
with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.
50.0 %Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete. Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to
teaching is missing. Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching. A detailed
evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided. Comprehensive
evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to
overcome barriers is provided.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed
and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It
is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of
the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack
logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but
ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the
reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in
command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 %Paper Format Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors
may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and
lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully
inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are
complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage